I'm not sure you can rule out photographs altogether. I mean, when you look at photographs of known wildlife, how many look hoaxed or outrightly fake? Most photos of known wildlife, whether taken by a novice or a professional look as real as they truly are. I truly believe that if a clear photo ever gets taken of a bonafide Bigfoot in its natural environment, it would most likely stand out as being something truly unique, and it would strike the minds eye as being something seen as never before. Very similar to people that have seen the Patterson film and stated that they had been haunted by the images that they had observed, like something other-worldly.
I for one, think the Patterson film is the greatest piece of photo evidence thus far in connection with Bigfoot. Considering the basic movie camera that was used in the PG film, the actual footage was quite good for the circumstances, and clear enough to show detail of the creature's size and movement. But, I remain skeptical of many of the other films and stills just for the fact that I have seen children take better photos and movies with basic equipment, of people andor animals, even under the element of surprise, with much better results than some of these so-called encounters.
I totally agree that the only thing that is going to satisfy everyone is going to be the capture of an actual Bigfoot, but it would be pretty exciting to see some great stills or moving footage of an actual creature in the meantime.
CoastalCritter |
|
