a so called extinct elephant
Posted by will the tall,
william_020_0@yahoo.com
, on Sat, Aug 12 2006, 5:27am
here is one more pic
Comment by:
twpiers1
on Nov 07, 2008
Its Sasquatch!!!!!
Comment by:
gothgirl
on Mar 27, 2008
Probaly a deformed ellephant.
Comment by:
plezio-nessie
on Dec 02, 2007
Perhaps the result of a previously recessed mammoth gene?
Comment by:
KingTutKelly
on Aug 20, 2007
i just think its a congenital deformity...
Comment by:
mv1014
on Aug 02, 2007
dosen't look like any elephant I've ever seen before.
Comment by:
B-man
on Jul 26, 2007
i also think that these elephants good just be regressing to a more primitive form due to a lack of interaction between them and other groups of elephants. they could also be regressing due to being to isolated cause we know that that is how sub-species eveolve.
Comment by:
westvoja
on Jul 04, 2007
An Asian Elephant, but not pure elephant nor Mammoth, but a mix-blooded Asian Elephant with at least one antestor that was a Mammoth!
Comment by:
AbeLincoln_ROCKZ_
on Jun 13, 2007
Elephants are big. Unlike my I.Q.
Comment by:
godisaprocrastinator
on Jun 02, 2007
everything
Comment by:
Cot-keeper
on May 14, 2007
What do elephants have to do with cryptozoology?
Comment by:
Ckyfan073
on May 13, 2007
its just a elephnt with a big dome
Comment by:
Crypticlover
on May 06, 2007
regular Asian Elephant.
Comment by:
ill-tell-what-i-think
on Mar 06, 2007
wow, an elephant. pretty cute-ish.
Comment by:
Sordes
on Feb 02, 2007
This is no mammoth and no birth defect or manipulated photo. I have seen this elephant once in a documentation and its DNA was examined. It came out that this elephants are nothing but a bit strange looking asian elephants.
Comment by:
Horse lover*
on Jan 23, 2007
Weird!!!!!!!
Comment by:
nicky the deer
on Jan 02, 2007
It's just an elephant with a birth defect.
Comment by:
Draconis667
on Dec 31, 2006
Even if it isn't a living fossil, it is interesting to see what mammoths could have looked like, of coure, with a lot more hair.
Comment by:
Cryptophsyco
on Dec 20, 2006
thats an elephant, and do nice to the " wonky" headed "mammoth"
Comment by:
MEG2th
on Dec 16, 2006
Butthead should be its name.ha ha ha
Comment by:
Taintedsilver
on Dec 12, 2006
Sjusta big 'ol asian elaphant witha wonkey forehead.
Comment by:
dinosaur
on Nov 17, 2006
Looks alot like a computer animation to me. If you look closely, you would see there is little detail in the pictures.
Comment by:
ancientpride
on Oct 18, 2006
asian elephant.......... dont know the speices.......
Comment by:
Sadistic-Jellyfish-Of-Doom
on Oct 15, 2006
Actually, they've recently found it to be a birth defect, AKA "Mutation"
Comment by:
Dizon__100
on Oct 03, 2006
arzi is wright
Comment by:
Arzi
on Sep 26, 2006
Have you never heard about Nepal elephant? Ive read about it in one book. Some scientists are searching it and they thing that it is a new third species of elephant.
Comment by:
cryptomental
on Sep 19, 2006
it has a lot of the same features of a mammoth so im saying its an extinct mammoth aswell
Comment by:
Dr. Rick G.
on Sep 16, 2006
I see no birth defects here. What I see is another so called "extinct" animal. I understand your reson for thinking it's a birth defect, but if it had one, I agree that it would have been abandoned in the wild.
Comment by:
Raeven
on Sep 15, 2006
Genetic mutation, passed down. End of story.
Comment by:
erinHates
on Sep 15, 2006
Possibly a birth defect caused by the fetus pushing against the mothers ribs. But I must say that in cases of birth defects in the wild, the infant is usually abandoned as any defect can be sensed by predators drawing unwanted attention to a herd
Comment by:
Dark Chaos
on Sep 04, 2006
well the feet are sometimes in the same position, but the trunk is in a diffrent position each time, i think its real
Comment by:
Thylacine_Fan
on Aug 29, 2006
guys, look at its feet. its always in the same position, i think this is a sculpture.
Comment by:
Evil_Mutated_Retarded_Cow
on Aug 28, 2006
that is cool.but i think its only a genetic mutation...would mammoths have more hair?I read somewhere that in japan they found mammoth DNA so in about 10 years they are gonna clone some wooly mammoths...that would beh cool.
Comment by:
3toehuntah
on Aug 25, 2006
I don't get it...is'nt it just a elephant with a sinus headache?
Comment by:
caddyboy768
on Aug 25, 2006
mutant.
Comment by:
cryptidkeeper
on Aug 24, 2006
i dont see nything just a photoshopped elephant
Comment by:
Arbiter
on Aug 20, 2006
evolution in the making.
Comment by:
Arbiter
on Aug 20, 2006
oooh! genetic transformation.
Comment by:
yo' mama
on Aug 20, 2006
is it real
Comment by:
yo' mama
on Aug 20, 2006
I can't belive it!
Comment by:
B-man
on Aug 16, 2006
i think its possible for present day elephants to still have promenent mammoth like features in their genes but i also think its possible for there to still be mammoths just not wooly because they evolved to fit the weather conditions in the areas where they lived after the ice age ended
Comment by:
Woodlauz
on Aug 16, 2006
Youre Right Zero Nightmare. And I really do
Comment by:
toecutter
on Aug 15, 2006
it ,also had vary menny DNA testes 2 get frum tha place 2 go 2.
Comment by:
Mr.Sasquatch
on Aug 15, 2006
if you imagine it covered in fur it does look Mammoth-like.
Comment by:
Ox_Olive_xO
on Aug 15, 2006
I just have to say Mastadon O_O IDK I dont know my extinct mammals like the back of my hand anymore...
Comment by:
Didus
on Aug 15, 2006
it is sub-species of asian elephant...
Comment by:
ZERO_NIGHTMARE
on Aug 15, 2006
wheres the fun in that woodlauz? cryptozoology is about beleiving in the craziest things!!!! geez...lol
Comment by:
s-heper-nenny heket
on Aug 14, 2006
Most mammoths didn't have fur. Only a couple species did, while the rest looked similar to the animal in the picture.
Comment by:
ZERO_NIGHTMARE
on Aug 14, 2006
so its a mammoth without furr... cool
Comment by:
sedward
on Aug 14, 2006
actualy from what i hear it's DNA testes show very few simularitys to an elaphants but it has many to the wooly mamath DNA they are able to colect from frozen scraps and stuff like that
Comment by:
Woodlauz
on Aug 14, 2006
Kewl, yes. Mammoth, no! believe me, if this was a real mammoth discovered in 1996 the entire WORLD would know.. Ive read about this.. I believe its mammoth-like "look" was caused by a genetic mutation or so.. Or so I read!
Comment by:
Blue Cow Spawned
on Aug 13, 2006
kewl