Cryptozoology.com

Bigfoot Track

Posted by Blue Cow Spawned on Thu, Jun 29 2006, 11:41pm

Found this large footprint could it be real?

Comment by: trychloroethlyne on May 25, 2008

real people don't fake photos then post them as real

Comment by: Dino-Disguise-Gal on Feb 07, 2008

It's hard being a cryptid, he's got a wife and kidds, so why not go to the beach for a family vacation al la suck

Comment by: No_matter_what_it_is_its-real on Oct 29, 2007

the pic is big, but the it could be just a close up at a normal foot print, and i agree with tonycannon, wat he hell is bigfoot doing on a beach

Comment by: Champ Champ on Aug 22, 2007

its your footprint

Comment by: wakesaftertwilight on Jun 14, 2007

Sometimes imprints in sand get distorted like imprints in the snow it's most likely a normal footprint that got all messed up...

Comment by: FredSneakers on Jun 03, 2007

Did you post more information on this print somewhere else on the site?

I would be very interested in knowing the story behind this image. You said you had taken a plaster cast of it as well?

I tried to reach you via email but it didn't work, great picture anyways!

Comment by: methe1andonly on Mar 17, 2007

since when was there a bigfoot print on sand....

Comment by: Mizz Phae on Mar 07, 2007

The toes are way too disproportionate to be legit. And- the term for curled toes isn't pigeon toes, it's hammer toe. I should know since I have it. P I doubt it's real but I can't really examin it well enough due to the fact that the picture is so huge.

Comment by: ill-tell-what-i-think on Mar 06, 2007

F*A*K*E!!!!

Comment by: MEG2th on Dec 16, 2006

Fake. the toes are scrunched up as if they've been in a shoe for quite some time.

Comment by: Cryptid lover on Nov 21, 2006

could be fake sand is easy to manipulate when wet

Comment by: El_ChUPaMaN on Nov 05, 2006

one word.........FAKE!

Comment by: shadow_creeper on Oct 13, 2006

not to mention that the sand displacement itself doesn't seem near deep enough. Also the lack of features of the actual print itself.

Comment by: shadow_creeper on Oct 13, 2006

I figure that this wasn't that big due to the realitive size comparison to the dead leaf within... the twig without, and the grains of sand all around.

Comment by: Dizon__100 on Oct 03, 2006

the pic is too big

Comment by: Loch ness mess on Aug 21, 2006

It is too big! I can not study it!

Comment by: Ms. Bigfoot to you on Aug 21, 2006

that to me looks EXTREMELY fake. There is no dimension. and the toes are perfect....an why would bigfoot prints be in sand..... O_o....and only one... besides, if it was reall, thee would be one, and they wouldn't be perfect, but a little messed up.

Comment by: pghreaper on Aug 17, 2006

Mugilo, There has been prints of bigfoot with only 3 toes, and one reporting of prints found here in PA with only 4

Comment by: Muglio on Aug 12, 2006

last time I checked, bigfoot had five toes.

Comment by: ZERO_NIGHTMARE on Aug 05, 2006

actaully i think bigfoots a flatfoot...

Comment by: Cryptid Hunt on Aug 04, 2006

there should at least be more sasquatch footprints left on or if its a beach?

Comment by: Jester-cap on Jul 31, 2006

sorry to sound weird or offending but mabe it was just some one with big feet and pigen toeswere the toes are curled ....

Comment by: Blue Cow Spawned on Jul 27, 2006

Its not on a beach its a backyard with forest behind it!!!

Comment by: Saint_Aimee on Jul 27, 2006

I wouldn't be surprised to see Bigfoot on the beach if it's up in the Pacific Northwest-- the forest goes right out to the beach out there.

Comment by: crypted_newby on Jul 25, 2006

that was taken on a beach it its a fake. wasent bigfoot suposed to be in a forest somewhere?

Comment by: Ulfkilljoy on Jul 23, 2006

Well..... if it is a fake concidder living your life without shoes EVER! and walk over all sorts of rought terrain and your tracks would loose some shape too, I had the misfortune of seeing the bottom of my ex inlaw's foot once and he worked all the time and was on his feet 247 and his own print looked horribly close to resemble this print! except he wore a size 12

Comment by: dragon_draconis on Jul 16, 2006

Wow I didn't know Bigfoot had deformed feet lol O_o

Comment by: mickfoleybigfoot on Jul 16, 2006

If you look close you can see toe nail imprints. Although, I could just be seeing things...

Comment by: Blue Cow Spawned on Jul 12, 2006

The plaster cast print u can see the ball and heel

Comment by: toecutter on Jul 11, 2006

not real...
i can make a better track in wet sand using my hand. i would include an arch, ball, toe differentiation and smeared frontbacktoe edges to simulate walking. then i would put my foot next to it and take a picture for comparison.
n00b making a hoax.

Comment by: Cryptophsyco on Jul 09, 2006

kinda makes u wonder, dont it

Comment by: Blue Cow Spawned on Jul 06, 2006

I have made a plaster cast of another print

Comment by: Jim Brikiatis on Jul 06, 2006

Hey, how long since you found this?Is it only one ore more?Any damage in your backyard, a killed pet or eaten fruits, or whatever?...honest?

Comment by: Jim Brikiatis on Jul 06, 2006

In your backyard?!!!!
Keep an eye, maybe it was a robber...A poor robber.

Comment by: Blue Cow Spawned on Jul 05, 2006

it is 15-20 inches long and in my backyard

Comment by: alaskan-cryptid-lover on Jul 04, 2006

how big is it and where did you find it

Comment by: Jim Brikiatis on Jul 04, 2006

Looks like a single human footprint...?Why it should be a big foot footprint?

It looks big because this simply happens if anyone walks in wet sant. The footprint will look bigger finally.

Comment by: Kettenhund on Jul 04, 2006

Okay, so you have discovered the world's only one-legged, flat-footed, anorexic big foot!

Take a look at your own foot print before you fake another one. Weight distribution is different on different parts of the print. Durr - different parts sink in by different amounts - the heel is always deeper than the arch

Now write out 1000 times "I must not be a naughty boy and produce poor quality fakes again."

Comment by: Azra Nogaru on Jul 03, 2006

theres no measurements of the foot, so how do we know its ACTUALY huge?

Comment by: Blue Cow Spawned on Jul 03, 2006

my coconclusion that the track i found is a hoax maybe not though

Comment by: shenron on Jul 02, 2006

A Fake track. the bottom is too flat and smooth. The sides don't show any ridges but sharp cut into the sand. It's a wooden foot.

Comment by: mountman on Jul 02, 2006

looks pretty much like a hoax to me

1.I'm pretty decent sized but nowhere near bigfoot weight and I sure wouldn't leave a perfectly flat track, theres no ball of the foot or any sign of movement in the track, even my 6 year old nephew leaves tracks that show movement in wet sand.

2. the big toe and the supposed little toe are the same size while the three middle toes are smaller

3 only one track? or did you only have one picture left in your camera?.