Cryptozoology forums > Cryptids > Prehistoric Survivors? > view thread
Subject: Re: New website
From: cloudyboy87 posted Mon, Oct 19 2009, 2:43am 
Hi "Stu". as of right now this is the closest I could find regarding your question about the Rines photos.
As for the other stuff. I have no photo shopped images or hoaxes on my site. If I believed that somersetting was false I would not present it as evidence. Case in point is the Ica stones. I know that many people regard them as hoaxes but this seems to be in opposition to the fact that they have been tested in several different ways for authenticity and passed every test they were submitted to. And as for the man admitting he faked them, who wouldn't sign the paper saying that they had faked an artifact and got off the hook when if they didn't they would go to prison? And then later retracted his statement about faking them. Yes there are fake ones but they can be easily distinguished from the real ones. You do however have a point about the photo credits, and yes I am working on that because I giving people credit where it is due.
Also, yes you haven't ranted and raved about anything I have said or presented so far and I thank you for being civil about it. And which artwork do you mean is PC rendered?
Thank you and God bless
Aaron Tullock
Subject: Re: New website
From: Stu posted Mon, Oct 19 2009, 3:30am 
The main icon (the saurian eye) looks PC-rendered. Nice job, but a bit too much like the cover of a Rodrigo y Gabriela album :~}

Hi "Stu". as of right now this is the closest I could find regarding your question about the Rines photos

But you've not said anything about it. I can assure you, Aaron, as a long-time 'Nessie' follower, that neither the 'flipper' nor 'body' sonar images captured by the Rines team have been declared "real and authentic". It may APPEAR real & authentic to you, & you may believe it's real & authentic. But no-one, including Bob Rines himself, has said it's so. The concensus opinion is that the 'body' shot's most likely an upturned tree stump/clump of wood. The same is true of the 'flipper' image.

There ARE a number of proven hoax photos on your site. I can go through them one by one with you if you like. These were made, obviously, in the days long before the Internet & Photoshop came along, when small-scale, built models were used to pose, sometimes superimposed, as 'dinosaurs'.

Stu


Close Window