 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Read two blogs and become depressed and disappointed |
| From: | |
MortisReaper
|
posted
Wed, Oct 31 2007, 7:09am
|
Tony,
You have managed to depress me on the same day my family and I saved two kittens from death by starvation. It is very sad to see something of beauty disappear. It reminds me of a group of rocks outside Gettysburg, PA that was instrumental with the underground railroad being quarried and thus permanently destroyed. History and another type of beauty gone. For you the only consolation is the potential of regrowth long after you have gone. Your loss is all of our loss.
I next ran into your living dinos blog and must say that despite the cute attempts it is rather poorly constructed and unispiring. I got the impression that you were really concerned about attacking Christians since it seems to be pc. I begin to chastise you and then I remember my recent history with religeous people.
What I take issue with is your statement, "which group has the more educated and, on average, intelligent people in it? A church service or a scientific laboratory?" This is a very poor statement indeed. I know many a religeous scientists and do know scientists that are not the brightest. I believe you can do better than this.
Don't make it a war against Christians. Attack those that perpetuate creationism based on their flawed calculations and refusal to acknowledge evidence.
I am in no way a creationist and do have problems with theologians that profess the Earth to be 7,000 years old. Being of a Catholic background, I was never taught that and actually know very few Catholics that follow that belief. I can not say the same for the way over there Christians (beyond the typical Protestant) since they have shunned me when I politely declined to joined their little church. I know many Protestants that in no way believe in creationism and yet they are religeous. Still, I would not point my issues towards Christians in general for there are a lot of Christians that do not follow the 7,000 year old creationism path.
Look at me now, I chastise you and I go rambling.
Who knows Tony, we may indeed be wrong about evolution and living dinosaurs. All we have to look at is the coelacanth. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
