 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Paranthropus as a Model for Sasquatch |
| From: | |
Brad
|
posted
Tue, Feb 12 2008, 9:54am
|
The ice age ended, though, and everything got smaller or died off
Well Sasquatch really isn't that big compared to the other megafauna. They are roughly the same size as a grizzly bear. We don't consider them as giants. And some megafauna went extinct due to human hunting, some species may still be here if not for that. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Paranthropus as a Model for Sasquatch |
| From: | |
Iprymate
|
posted
Tue, Feb 12 2008, 12:22pm
|
|
Only big compared to any hominid before or since. Same as a griz, it's a loner omnivore, fitting in, and maybe even bulking up and snoozing for a month or two, but there were also larger bears then, making griz pee and run toward the future where it could claim being cool and tough. Are there more people now considered "little" than "giant?" They may have an advantage. Maybe squatch is also getting smaller. Not so cool, but futuristic. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Paranthropus as a Model for Sasquatch |
| From: | |
LTLurker
|
posted
Thu, Mar 6 2008, 3:24am
|
|
Perhaps sasquatch is getting smaller but the rate of adaptation is very low because the population is low and the birthrate is low. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Paranthropus as a Model for Sasquatch |
| From: | |
Brad
|
posted
Thu, Mar 27 2008, 3:29am
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
