 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Forest in the North East |
| From: | |
Tarzan
|
posted
Tue, Jul 17 2007, 11:05pm
|
Pardon me for butting in, in case someone already mentioned this:
Is the eastern forest contiguous? Is the forest composed of primarily indigenous flora? And if the eastern forest is contiguous, is it of a size that would meet bigfoot's territorial needs? A grizzly bear, I think, needs 200 miles of territory. Would that be enough for a larger animal?
Tarzan |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Forest in the North East |
| From: | |
xSASQUATCHx
|
posted
Fri, Jul 20 2007, 10:17pm
|
|
but sasquatch has to be much smarter then a bear and could easily get more nutrition from a smaller area |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
