 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: my thoughts |
| From: | |
kittenz
|
posted
Thu, Sep 10 2009, 8:17pm
|
The more bigfoot "evidence" that I see, the less believable the possibility of bigfoot's existence becomes. It all seems to be too much like grasping at straws.
No carcasses found by scavenging dogs. No unambiguous photo evidence. No bigfoot ever shot by a hunter, killed by a vehicle or washed up after a flash flood. No bigfoot found dead any time, anywhere. No bigfoot fossils.
Bigfoot are too intelligent to leave fossils or get killed by accident in locations where their bodies will be found? Please. People get killed by accidents and natural catastrophes all the time, and while they are admittedly rare, people leave fossils and traces of their life activities. Where are those of bigfoot?
Maybe in the vast forested areas of the Pacific northwest there is an unknown animal that is bigfoot (hominid or not). But the evidence is remarkable for its absence. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
