 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Rational Deduction |
| From: | |
Karl
|
posted
Mon, Sep 7 2009, 9:46pm
|
I don't believe folks would be out of line claiming that "Bigfoot must be the answer soon, because he's never been the answer before!" Though some may argue that Bigfoot has been the answer all along. The problem is that on a twenty-sided die, Bigfoot might be number 21, and therefore never roll up. Or Bigfoot might be tails on a double-headed coin. It's the curse of the two-headed coin. The fact that nothing ever has come up "Bigfoot" after all these years is a fair indication that nothing ever will come up "Bigfoot".
I believe a good number of cryptid fanatics are far too egocentric to accept any kind of leadership; they want to think out and do things entirely their own way. They want to be the top bananas.
Hey, crop circles are real; people used to make them all the time. (Ordinarily I'd insert a winking emoticon here, but each time I try, Cisco's server boots me off and I have to kill a bunch of cookies to get back on). |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
