Cryptozoology forums > Blogs > Scott Marlowe's blog > view thread
Subject: Re: Biscardi footage and comparisons with fossil apes
From: scmarlowe posted Fri, Jul 13 2007, 3:32am 
While I'm certain about the designation, I still have some doubts about the dating.

Russell McCarty at the U of F is who I went to about the find. He apparently used MacFadden's work to establish the range of the oreodont in North Florida -- suggesting that the find in Bradenton was much farther south than "previously known".

I still believe that more evidence of the animal needs to be found to bs sure about dating and the possibility of disturbed fossil bed remains being carried here by some other mechanism than death of the animal at the place of find.

So far, Bison, Cave Bear, Peccary, Mammoth, Manatee, Shark, Oreodont, Giant Beaver, and other remains have surfaced in this bone yard. The problem now is that the owner has closed off the property to further excavation in preparation to develop the land.
Subject: Re: Biscardi footage and comparisons with fossil apes
From: Arctodus posted Fri, Aug 31 2007, 4:01am 
Huh?!? An end pleistocene oreodont?!?

I agree that it is certainly possible that fossil hominids in north america
may be underrepresented.We know that red pandas occupied north america during the middle pleistocene.The evidence, a single tooth out of Tennessee.A fossil dhole jaw has been recovered from a mexican bonebed 40,000 years old.


Close Window