Cryptozoology forums > Cryptids > Chimaera/Chimera > view thread
Subject: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: N. Mihalos posted Sat, Dec 27 2008, 5:48pm 
So could this be the next stage of Buffalo Evolution?

Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: raditz posted Sat, Dec 27 2008, 6:54pm 
or it could just be a deformed/mutated/premature fetus
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: Falon_Jabberwok posted Fri, Mar 13 2009, 6:35am 
I'm surprised at you all. We ALL know how this happened...
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: /PJ posted Sun, Dec 28 2008, 1:18am 
Considering buffalos aren't human anyway, does it shock you that what it gave birth to isn't human either?
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: haf-DED posted Thu, Feb 26 2009, 6:58am 
That's what I was thinking.
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: hw posted Sun, Dec 28 2008, 3:37am 
Ok, it looks like its dead. Now let's butcher it and market its flesh as "minotaur meat"!
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: badger man posted Sun, Dec 28 2008, 5:57am 
Finally! The evidence I needed to prove humans evolved from buffaloes not apes.
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: Datu Puti posted Sun, Dec 28 2008, 1:04pm 
ugh.... now how am i supposed to enjoy my buffalo wings???
-dan
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: TheDirtyOne posted Tue, Dec 30 2008, 2:14am 
Buffaloes have wings?!?
Subject: Indeed
From: Stu posted Tue, Dec 30 2008, 4:20am 
As you can see, I have empirical corroborative proof.
Subject: Re: Indeed
From: Tyranid Broodlord posted Tue, Dec 30 2008, 9:56am 
it's just a mutant calf most mutants don't survive birth due to a fatal genome, besides chances are if it did survive birth then it's mother would have rejected it even though it has a face only a mother could love, and a couple of people on the site can't really understand evolution, it doesn't happen instantly like poof! there's a species of Buffalo that is like a human more like in several million years time buffalo would gradually evolve into a human like creature(in the ideal conditions eg no competition from other species etc)
Subject: Re: Indeed
From: TheDirtyOne posted Tue, Dec 30 2008, 8:23pm 
...
Subject: Re: Indeed
From: Tyranid Broodlord posted Thu, Jan 1 2009, 4:47am 
oops sorry i gotta remember to use the fullstop button once in a while
Subject: Re: Indeed
From: EastTxSwamp posted Sun, Jan 4 2009, 10:13pm 
Man, thanks for the biology lesson! So there's no chance it's Photoshopped or something like that?

Swamp
Subject: Re: Indeed
From: EastTxSwamp posted Sun, Jan 4 2009, 10:14pm 
And are those crocodile skins it's laying on?
Subject: Re: Indeed
From: chobitz posted Tue, Jan 6 2009, 2:37am 
nope.. i think its one of those asian mats...
Subject: Re: Indeed
From: Cherokee posted Mon, Jan 12 2009, 8:29pm 
Hey Swamp, those are woven mats that it is on. My ex-husband was from Laos, and we had several of those them. They are used like tables, even though they are on the floor.
Subject: Re: Indeed
From: EastTxSwamp posted Wed, Jan 14 2009, 3:00am 
Thanks for that. I've been wondering since I saw that pic (no, really, I have, no sarcasm intended). Wado.

Swamp
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: beaver posted Tue, Jan 6 2009, 7:07pm 
Dont tickle its belly, it will giggle.
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: Raynman posted Tue, Jan 13 2009, 11:51pm 
My thoughts are that it is a genetic mutation, not a chimera. My understanding is that a genetic mutation is an aberration or an anomaly of genetic material that may not be phylogenic. I though a chimera was the occurence of two different genetic codes within the same organism. This could be the genetic information from two species occurring in the same organism. If the chimerism is not species differentiated, it is where there is differing code of the same species. In a human, for example, it would be different hair color on opposite sides of the body or one blue eye and one green eye. Not too different from the two pauses in your title sentence, both are supposed to mean the same, but one is an "umm", the other an "uhh".
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: Mutant posted Fri, Jan 23 2009, 5:04am 
Maybe its a genetic mutation or a premature birth. Looks more like premature birth to me. Just my opinion.
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: haf-DED posted Thu, Feb 26 2009, 7:01am 
"Not too different from the two pauses in your title sentence, both are supposed to mean the same, but one is an "umm", the other an "uhh"."

What are you even talking about?
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: LD posted Mon, Jan 26 2009, 5:42am 
tely tubby perhaps? never know just what station those buggers are tuned to ya know?
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: MJLehde posted Sun, Feb 1 2009, 12:37am 
Can't help but wonder why it seems to have been rolled in flour. Were they planning to dispose of the body via the traditonal native method of deep fat frying?
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: Therst posted Mon, Feb 2 2009, 10:58pm 
Which way to the vomitorium?
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: MarineLife posted Fri, Feb 20 2009, 12:24pm 
Mutant Baby, with a Big DIAPER, stuffed with toilet paper, covered in POWDER!!!
Nice post, Link Man!

*ML
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: haf-DED posted Thu, Feb 26 2009, 6:57am 
I saw this on here like last year. The article told what the deal was, but I suppose that it has been lost in the shuffle. It was something mundane and very uninteresting. I can't for the life of me remember what it was. Something like it was premature and this is just a normal state in the development of the fetus.

I'm pretty sure that it was a cow last time, too.

-DED
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: Stitches posted Fri, Feb 27 2009, 3:26am 
Looks like a Tauren
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: Philosoraptor posted Tue, Mar 3 2009, 12:38am 
looks like it mated with an elephant
Subject: Re: Buffalo gave birth to umm, something, uhh, something not Human???
From: ShaidoAiel posted Sat, Mar 14 2009, 4:58am 
it does indeed look like it mated with an elephant! is that a trunk?


Close Window