Cryptozoology forums > General Cryptozoology > Sightings talk > view thread

Subject: Re: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo. From: Just Joan posted Sat, Oct 24 2009, 9:33pm  A tenner is 6 inches long. That makes the "print" about 10 inches long, toe to heel. My own are 9 inches long. I'm 5"5. Bigfoot is not living up to his name, IMO. Have you recorded the locations of your sightings? Have you a willingness to let some experienced trackers/hunters stake out the area? Subject: Re: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo. From: Goldstein posted Mon, Oct 26 2009, 3:45pm  My bare feet are exactly 11" long. I'm 5'11" tall and wear a UK size 10 (i think that's a US size 11? or maybe 9, i know they are one size off from each other but can't remember in which direction) shoe. That's no Bigfoot. Subject: Re: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo. From: gumhead posted Fri, Oct 30 2009, 4:04pm  I've seen Bigfoot but i got no pictures of it Subject: Re: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo. From: Ella posted Thu, Nov 12 2009, 1:33pm  Joan, it could be a juvenile footprint. A good friend sent me two plasters casts of a "teen-age male Bigfoot"--they were about that length. I gave them away, but they looked just like an adult man's footprint who wears a size 10 shoe. Subject: Re: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo. From: Just Joan posted Sun, Nov 15 2009, 8:29pm  Good point on the possibility of a juvenile - I hadn't considered that. My initial doubts about the print come from the pine needle that is aligned along an edge of it. That seems too tidy of a placement for a footprint, and highly likely for water flow to cause.

Close Window