Cryptozoology forums > General Cryptozoology > Sightings talk > view thread
Subject: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo.
From: falls posted Thu, Oct 22 2009, 7:57am 
Good, shot! Looks like he was on the way to the store...he dropped a tenspot. Seriously though, I have personally seen at least five CLEAR sightings of Sasquatch, (one walked across a major highway in front of me, and another was on the side of a seldom used road eating berries...not sure who was more surprised, him/her, or me!) and have found a few sets of footprints.
Subject: Re: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo.
From: Ursustyrannis posted Fri, Oct 23 2009, 2:23pm 
your name is apt, now add "flat" to it.
Subject: Re: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo.
From: Ella posted Thu, Nov 12 2009, 1:40pm 
This time, I say give Falls the benefit of the doubt. That print could be a Bigfoot print, although if so, an immature BF--or it could be a large man's footprint who was walking barefoot in the thick woods of SE Oklahoma, why, I don't know. But it looks like the footprint of a man or manlike creature. :)
Subject: Re: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo.
From: Rangoon posted Sat, Oct 24 2009, 4:37am 
First of all that isn't a foot print.

And you couldn't have missed the thread that was already started about the "non-print". So my guess would be that you're another "wanna-be" with no tracking skills and little reason to be given any credibility.
Subject: Re: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo.
From: Just Joan posted Sat, Oct 24 2009, 9:33pm 
A tenner is 6 inches long. That makes the "print" about 10 inches long, toe to heel. My own are 9 inches long. I'm 5"5. Bigfoot is not living up to his name, IMO.

Have you recorded the locations of your sightings? Have you a willingness to let some experienced trackers/hunters stake out the area?
Subject: Re: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo.
From: Goldstein posted Mon, Oct 26 2009, 3:45pm 
My bare feet are exactly 11" long. I'm 5'11" tall and wear a UK size 10 (i think that's a US size 11? or maybe 9, i know they are one size off from each other but can't remember in which direction) shoe. That's no Bigfoot.
Subject: Re: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo.
From: gumhead posted Fri, Oct 30 2009, 4:04pm 
I've seen Bigfoot but i got no pictures of it
Subject: Re: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo.
From: Ella posted Thu, Nov 12 2009, 1:33pm 
Joan, it could be a juvenile footprint. A good friend sent me two plasters casts of a "teen-age male Bigfoot"--they were about that length. I gave them away, but they looked just like an adult man's footprint who wears a size 10 shoe.
Subject: Re: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo.
From: Just Joan posted Sun, Nov 15 2009, 8:29pm 
Good point on the possibility of a juvenile - I hadn't considered that. My initial doubts about the print come from the pine needle that is aligned along an edge of it. That seems too tidy of a placement for a footprint, and highly likely for water flow to cause.
Subject: Re: First Bigfoot(Sasquatch) photo.
From: Ella posted Thu, Nov 12 2009, 1:28pm 
WOW, WOW, Falls, how fortunate you are to have had some BF signthings! Now you know for sure he's real (and she), and no one can take that knowledge away from you. SE OK, and also SE central OK, are hot spots, and I've seen plenty of footprints there myself, but alas, no sightings.


Close Window