 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | 1700 year-old footprints found at Lod |
| From: | |
Stu
|
posted
Sun, Oct 18 2009, 11:03am
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: 1700 year-old footprints found at Lod |
| From: | |
Loreweaver
|
posted
Mon, Oct 19 2009, 10:36am
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: 1700 year-old footprints found at Lod |
| From: | |
MikeK
|
posted
Sun, Oct 25 2009, 7:13pm
|
|
I am truly surprised that a "Nike Swoop" is not visible. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|