 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
Stu
|
posted
Wed, Oct 28 2009, 4:35pm
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
Guodzilla
|
posted
Wed, Oct 28 2009, 7:16pm
|
"Hands, messing with their pil . . ." (blinks) OH!!!!! I get it NOW. . . (Discreetly removes mind from gutter) |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
luna1580
|
posted
Thu, Oct 29 2009, 1:37am
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
kittenz
|
posted
Thu, Oct 29 2009, 9:23am
|
|
They went looking for Bigfoot in Greenbrier National Forest in WV last year. Since 1989 I have been going camping in Greenbrier National Forest; have been there many times in every season, camping, hiking, & fishing and have never seen anything to indicate that Bigfoot might be living there. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
lowredx
|
posted
Thu, Oct 29 2009, 10:55am
|
|
It's amazing how that works, a person can spend their whole life in an area and not see any evidence at all, yet the average bigfoot researcher can show up and find a boatload of evidence in one weekend in the same location. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
spoOklight
|
posted
Fri, Oct 30 2009, 1:54am
|
|
Never seen a BF there but, I have seen a cougar there. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
Ella
|
posted
Fri, Oct 30 2009, 1:07pm
|
|
Well, also, real field researchers know what to look for, such as tree structures, which are very different from deadfall, but go unnoticed unless you know what to look for. Not that I was ever a researcher, but was shown tree structures a few years ago by one. Also lots of clear footprints! They know just what to look for, that's all. But such things are not proof--there is no absolute, undeniable proof so far and maybe never will be. Only those who are lucky enough to have had a real sighting(s) know for sure, and that's not proof because few will take their word for it, of course. :) |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
lowredx
|
posted
Fri, Oct 30 2009, 7:30pm
|
|
Yeah Ella, I have spent my whole life getting to know all the creatures that live in my area, yet don't have the same level of nature skill as a researcher who just showed up. There is a huge amount to be said for knowing what is outside the normal and being able to notice it outside the mudane. A skill that I have yet to see a single bigfoot researcher demostrate. I am not buying for a minute that they see things cause they know what to look for. Sorry. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
Ella
|
posted
Sat, Oct 31 2009, 11:26am
|
|
That's all right, LRX, you're just as entitled to your opinion as I am or anybody else. :) |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
dkmightyhammer
|
posted
Sat, Oct 31 2009, 4:28pm
|
Not sure what that really proves. I bet that people have lived in NYC their entire lives and never seen Donald Trump walking around either. I'm pretty sure he exists even if most of the population never see him while living in the same city.
When I worked for Fish & Wildlife I saw a bear cub by Strubel Lake once. I spent the next 3 months doing a creel census at that lake and never saw another bear. So just because some one finds BF evidence at a location where you routinely go and never find any evidence is actually proof of nothing. Its really just proof of your own bad luck or bad timing. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
BillB
|
posted
Thu, Oct 29 2009, 12:19pm
|
|
Ever notice how those who want to find a Bigfoot (or any other cryptid) makes those incredible leaps of logic with a negligible amount of evidence? |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
Rangoon
|
posted
Thu, Oct 29 2009, 2:50pm
|
|
Our own or former member "Road less traveled" investigated Dolly sods a number of times and came up only finding skepticism iirc. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
Stu
|
posted
Fri, Oct 30 2009, 6:27am
|
Dolly Sods.
Sounds like a sort of lights-out, 'uncomfortable' activity.......
Just saying, is all. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
BillB
|
posted
Fri, Oct 30 2009, 1:05pm
|
|
Could also be a female Country music singer from the 1930s or 40s. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
MJLehde
|
posted
Fri, Oct 30 2009, 3:41pm
|
|
I was thinking more along the lines of some weird and twisted mix of country music and XXX porn,,,which isn't a bad thing in itself but I'm not really a big fan of country music. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
BillB
|
posted
Fri, Oct 30 2009, 4:20pm
|
...some weird and twisted mix of country music and XXX porn...
Would they call that "cornography"? |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
MJLehde
|
posted
Fri, Oct 30 2009, 11:22pm
|
|
Yes they would but not below the Mason Dixon Line where it is instead considered fine art |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
BillB
|
posted
Sat, Oct 31 2009, 1:49am
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
Rangoon
|
posted
Sun, Nov 1 2009, 6:10am
|
|
I just heard an ad for colon cleansing;now some how you conjured the image of a country porn queen who's into enemas..."Oie vie" |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
MJLehde
|
posted
Sun, Nov 1 2009, 11:34am
|
|
Oh thanks for the visual that just waddled through my mind! Now I'm not going to be able to sleep at night unless someone holds my hand and keeps whispering "Goon was only kidding, Goon was only kidding". |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
kittenz
|
posted
Sat, Oct 31 2009, 7:24am
|
|
Dolly Sods is beautiful. There are alpine bogs there with species found nowhere else south of Canada. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
bendo
|
posted
Sat, Oct 31 2009, 10:41am
|
|
Its also funny that one of the down the sleeve Georgia Hoax people are involved and yet..................Biscardi has announced that he will be there soon on the invitation of a American Idiot....I mean idol flunky.......go figure. Many losing careers needing to get and keep their name in print. I think the whole thing is suspicious. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| Subject: | | Re: Bigfoot search in West Virginia turns up suspicious footprints |
| From: | |
Stu
|
posted
Tue, Nov 3 2009, 8:49am
|
Attention-seekers.
You'll find quite a few on this site too, strangely enough. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |