Cryptozoology forums > Debates > Evolution vs. Creationism > view thread

Subject: Re: The Value of Scientific Consensus From: luna1580 posted Fri, Nov 6 2009, 2:16am  crichton may have done a lot of research, but he seems to have done a very poor job of absorbing the parts of it that conflicted with the opinion on climate change he had going into that research process. just for a start: RealClimate: Michael Crichton's State of Confusion RealClimate: Michael Crichton's State of Confusion II: Return of the Science Review of Michael Crichton's State of Fear : Weather Underground Answers to Key Questions Raised by M. Crichton in State of Fear | Pew Center on Global Climate Change: The Pew Center on Global Climate Change Subject: Re: The Value of Scientific Consensus From: hroth posted Fri, Nov 6 2009, 11:18am  I think he made a pretty good case for land use playing a significant role in the perceived increase in temps worldwide... And it's obviously heavy-handed about Hollywood types, no doubt. But it is a novel, after all.

Close Window