 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: "Drunks in Northern Minnesota claimed they killed a river monster" |
| From: | |
ConstantReader
|
posted
Sat, Nov 7 2009, 10:55am
|
Thank you, Ella, and I passed your compliments on to "the boys".
You could be right, maybe it IS Trunko. Or is that what they're calling moonshine these days? {80) |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: "Drunks in Northern Minnesota claimed they killed a river monster" |
| From: | |
Ella
|
posted
Sat, Nov 7 2009, 12:34pm
|
|
Well, since Trunko was most probably the dead and decomposing body of a basking shark, this creature was probably a figment of the dead and decomposing minds of the drunkards! :D :D |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: "Drunks in Northern Minnesota claimed they killed a river monster" |
| From: | |
ConstantReader
|
posted
Sat, Nov 7 2009, 5:54pm
|
You got that right, Ella!
Case closed. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
