 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Eltanin Antenna (Sponge or Not?) |
| From: | |
K. Kitsune Fox
|
posted
Wed, Aug 25 2004, 1:11pm
|
I found an artical on this subject at Fortean Times' Website, and decided to break it down to just the most important facts and see what I could work out for my own desicion as an Armchair Crytozoologist. Here are my facts and my "findings" (they're inconclusive right now)
-+-
Facts: (From http://www.forteantimes.com/articles/183_eltanin1.shtml)
#1: USNS Eltanin (the ship) really existed.
#2: The scientists on the ship were interviewed, and found to have not tampered with the picture.
#3: Confers with a point found by Bruce Cathie, who did the research concerning numerology and UFOlogy.
#4: In 2003 one of the Eltanin scientists, AF Amos, was revisited. He referred the e-list researcher, Tom DeMary, to the book Face of the Deep by Bruce Heezen and Charles Hollister. The book said the following: “While the bath sponges are limited to the warmest shallow waters of the continental shelf, a few of their bizarre relatives are rather commonly found in the deep sea. Cladorhiza, a particularly dramatic one which somewhat resembles a space-age microwave antenna, was not uncommon in the early dredge hauls of Challenger and Blake…” and “they are sponges with a long stem ending in ramifying roots, sunk deeply into the mud. The stem has nodes with four to six club-like appendages. They evidently cover like bushes extensive tracts of the bottom.”
Conclusion:
Until such time as I manage to find a photograph of the Cladorhiza sponge, I refuse to cast judgment on the topic. I also will not further investigate the Bruce Cathie angle (which I find to be much less viable an option). Should the Cladorhiza sponge be found to be a non-viable answer, then the Bruce Cathie correspondences will have to be researched further.
-+-
So, if anyone has a picture of the sponge that I could compair to the Eltanin Antenna photo (which I'll submitt to the Gallery), I'd greatly appreciate it.
-Kit |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Eltanin Antenna (Sponge or Not?) |
| From: | |
Kraken
|
posted
Wed, Aug 25 2004, 6:29pm
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Eltanin Antenna (Sponge or Not?) |
| From: | |
K. Kitsune Fox
|
posted
Wed, Aug 25 2004, 7:30pm
|
Excellent. Thanks for the link. Seeing the original artical is good for my research...
A link from that site that you gave even had a link to a picture... http://scisun.nybg.org:8890/searchdb/owa/wwwcatalogrenz.detail_list? this_id=4367092
NowI've got to put some time into getting a scale indicatore for the Antenna picture... because those spounges are pretty small... I'll have to put some research into the maxiumu size and the like... |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Eltanin Antenna (Sponge or Not?) |
| From: | |
Heist
|
posted
Fri, Aug 27 2004, 10:14pm
|
|
The magazine published a two-parter that pretty much cleared it up in my mind. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Eltanin Antenna (Sponge or Not?) |
| From: | |
K. Kitsune Fox
|
posted
Sat, Aug 28 2004, 7:18am
|
Untill I get some sort of indication of the Antenna's scale, I refuse to bow to a magazine artical.
Which magazine was it? |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Eltanin Antenna (Sponge or Not?) |
| From: | |
Cricket
|
posted
Thu, Sep 2 2004, 8:00am
|
|
I think the article said it was two feet tall. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |  | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subject: | | Re: Eltanin Antenna (Sponge or Not?) |
| From: | |
Larry Hatch
|
posted
Mon, Jun 20 2005, 2:04am
|
Hello all: If you want to see the original article, I recommend this page:
http://www.larryhatch.net/ELTANIN.html
The Eltanin Antenna was exposed as Cladorhiza Concrescens for the first time on that page of mine. Numerous copycats have since copied it in whole or in part. I recommend the original above for full text and images. If someone can make sure the link is clickable, I would much appreciate it.
Thanks - Larry HatchOriginal Eltanin Antenna article. |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|